Yesterday the Libyan leader has returned to speak on TV, now all heads of government of the world use every day means the media to shape the crowds to their thinking. Rais
The position of the eyes of the world is indefensible, yet cheered by a crowd of people, talk to the people and fighting back the West, trying to group with the forces that remain at his side.
But based on what the defense of his position Gaddafi? What can never say a person is guilty of crimes, ordered against their own people? First
Gaddafi no longer considers his people all people who have decided to take up arms against the government, but to get to that point, his thinking is quite shiny, does not seem the words of a mad murderer. The
Rais says that the first hint of the event, all the Western oil companies have called back all the workers and managers, says that the almost immediate support of the great democracies, rather than be moved by moral interest, economic interest. Port of the examples to hand that send chills up because they were considered ramblings of a leader in decline, but terribly true, unfortunately. The examples in question are two: the first is the charge of the powerful democracies (EU and U.S.), not caring about African countries continues to internal struggle (guerrilla) to the power of one state, mass murder and armed struggle are on the agenda in many African countries such as Uganda, Burundi, Somalia, Eritrea, Sudan, Congo, Nigeria, Liberia, Central African Republic, Algeria and Western Sahara. In all these cases, never the world public opinion has raised supporting the insurgents or militia of the state, and on this occasion, at the first sign of protest, the eco world has been devastating, and therefore the Rais insisted: ".. . is tied to oil, they want to enslave us and put our hands on a par with other states. "
The second example touches us closely, Rais says, "... because in Italy despite all cities in the country are taken to the streets to demonstrate against the government, Prime Minister Berlusconi and his colleagues have resigned? ", and here too, always remembering that he ordered his militia to fire on the crowd and therefore is not You can take sides when hundreds of lives are broken in this way, we see at least his shiny reflection, Italy is facing a deep economic and moral crisis, but the great democracies have failed to notice or opinions resignation.
Since Gaddafi and his family are at the head of Libya, the country is considered one of the world's oil powers, we note the worrying similarities in the attitude of the U.S. with Iraq during the Gulf War. There are three phases: attack the media (with videos and documents to put in a bad light of world public opinion the government concerned), political attack (where intimate the establishment of hegemony by the EU and U.S. in the next government), physical attack (the real war with the landing of troops).
The media impact of these two conflicts has been devastating, the openings of the news around the world speak of the situation in Libya and the time talking about the Iraq war, even in primary schools were and are given information about these conflicts, minds often unprepared to the weight of these circumstances.
So I wonder, is it possible that the large powers to move back only when there is oil? And 'doing wheelies possible that the cost of crude, the U.S. banking and empires (the only law to be able to immobilize large quantities of oil in expectation of a surplus value) are gaining on the broken lives of Libyans? But the moral problem of mass murder is not the same if the presence of an interest of another kind that moves the action of the powers that do not defend the lives of the people, but its economy? We are sure to be well informed about what is going on in Libya? Where will the uprising of all the African countries of the Mediterranean, a war of global dimensions?
The position of the eyes of the world is indefensible, yet cheered by a crowd of people, talk to the people and fighting back the West, trying to group with the forces that remain at his side.
But based on what the defense of his position Gaddafi? What can never say a person is guilty of crimes, ordered against their own people? First
Gaddafi no longer considers his people all people who have decided to take up arms against the government, but to get to that point, his thinking is quite shiny, does not seem the words of a mad murderer. The
Rais says that the first hint of the event, all the Western oil companies have called back all the workers and managers, says that the almost immediate support of the great democracies, rather than be moved by moral interest, economic interest. Port of the examples to hand that send chills up because they were considered ramblings of a leader in decline, but terribly true, unfortunately. The examples in question are two: the first is the charge of the powerful democracies (EU and U.S.), not caring about African countries continues to internal struggle (guerrilla) to the power of one state, mass murder and armed struggle are on the agenda in many African countries such as Uganda, Burundi, Somalia, Eritrea, Sudan, Congo, Nigeria, Liberia, Central African Republic, Algeria and Western Sahara. In all these cases, never the world public opinion has raised supporting the insurgents or militia of the state, and on this occasion, at the first sign of protest, the eco world has been devastating, and therefore the Rais insisted: ".. . is tied to oil, they want to enslave us and put our hands on a par with other states. "
The second example touches us closely, Rais says, "... because in Italy despite all cities in the country are taken to the streets to demonstrate against the government, Prime Minister Berlusconi and his colleagues have resigned? ", and here too, always remembering that he ordered his militia to fire on the crowd and therefore is not You can take sides when hundreds of lives are broken in this way, we see at least his shiny reflection, Italy is facing a deep economic and moral crisis, but the great democracies have failed to notice or opinions resignation.
Since Gaddafi and his family are at the head of Libya, the country is considered one of the world's oil powers, we note the worrying similarities in the attitude of the U.S. with Iraq during the Gulf War. There are three phases: attack the media (with videos and documents to put in a bad light of world public opinion the government concerned), political attack (where intimate the establishment of hegemony by the EU and U.S. in the next government), physical attack (the real war with the landing of troops).
The media impact of these two conflicts has been devastating, the openings of the news around the world speak of the situation in Libya and the time talking about the Iraq war, even in primary schools were and are given information about these conflicts, minds often unprepared to the weight of these circumstances.
So I wonder, is it possible that the large powers to move back only when there is oil? And 'doing wheelies possible that the cost of crude, the U.S. banking and empires (the only law to be able to immobilize large quantities of oil in expectation of a surplus value) are gaining on the broken lives of Libyans? But the moral problem of mass murder is not the same if the presence of an interest of another kind that moves the action of the powers that do not defend the lives of the people, but its economy? We are sure to be well informed about what is going on in Libya? Where will the uprising of all the African countries of the Mediterranean, a war of global dimensions?
Cristian Amadei
0 comments:
Post a Comment