Studying for 14 years at best, to do practical training for at least two others, pass 3 or 4 competitions so hard to become Auditor Judiciary and so for two years, pass a further competition to follow an endless series of preparation courses for exams in matters concerning civil, criminal and administrative law. Overcoming
oral exams: fundamental elements of civil law and Roman law, civil procedure, criminal law, criminal procedure, administrative law, constitutional and tax law, labor law and social security law, international law and legal elements of computer science, all obviously in the best cases, and without being able to repeat the exam more than three times without being over 40 years. This
to become the life of the Magistrate Judge or Prosecutor, and yet there are people who think of them as the enemy, such as "red robes," as people from which to defend themselves because they just can not beat them in any way.
Despite all this, though, there are still people who give to have a normal life, made dinners, discos and pubs, friends, football and various leisure to devote himself to study, to enforce laws, a life dedicated to justice.
Our days are hard, there are many unanswered questions, many issues in the views and conflicting ideas are listening, but in this case there can be no plausible speech.
Reforming justice by allowing citizens to use the State to name a judge or a magistrate who has been their practice or judged them, is to make people that interrogators have no basis of matter.
do not even want to think about the reasons which prompted the Minister for the Alfano law, I do not want to fall into the usual arguments that trial pack the news, whether a law driven to defend the indefensible, I just want to open the eyes of readers.
You can not delete the last semblance of civility, justice.
least in this case there should be no division of opinion, he is dismantling the fabric of our society, you are trampling on many years of hard study and work, you are walking on Justice.
Anyone still have a chance to veto, I do, or will be very difficult to stop future consequences triggered by this reform.
That we are all equal before the law is a fundamental principle that is trampled every day in our country, but give the opportunity, without a brake, for every citizen to seek compensation from those who held, would begin a downward spiral of even more cases that clog the judicial machinery.
be guilty beyond all doubt is difficult to prove in evidence of proof, and for this reason that the trials last for many years, lawyers and procedural errors committed every day in defense of citizens, make the very complex matter, not can propose a reform in an uncertain situation like the one that is hitting our country, where the majority is not solid, where no political surrender their privileges but through laws and financial cuts in all areas, education and culture over all.
We want stability and reform the law to justice in a country world-renowned stability and legality in our country are not there.
oral exams: fundamental elements of civil law and Roman law, civil procedure, criminal law, criminal procedure, administrative law, constitutional and tax law, labor law and social security law, international law and legal elements of computer science, all obviously in the best cases, and without being able to repeat the exam more than three times without being over 40 years. This
to become the life of the Magistrate Judge or Prosecutor, and yet there are people who think of them as the enemy, such as "red robes," as people from which to defend themselves because they just can not beat them in any way.
Despite all this, though, there are still people who give to have a normal life, made dinners, discos and pubs, friends, football and various leisure to devote himself to study, to enforce laws, a life dedicated to justice.
Our days are hard, there are many unanswered questions, many issues in the views and conflicting ideas are listening, but in this case there can be no plausible speech.
Reforming justice by allowing citizens to use the State to name a judge or a magistrate who has been their practice or judged them, is to make people that interrogators have no basis of matter.
do not even want to think about the reasons which prompted the Minister for the Alfano law, I do not want to fall into the usual arguments that trial pack the news, whether a law driven to defend the indefensible, I just want to open the eyes of readers.
You can not delete the last semblance of civility, justice.
least in this case there should be no division of opinion, he is dismantling the fabric of our society, you are trampling on many years of hard study and work, you are walking on Justice.
Anyone still have a chance to veto, I do, or will be very difficult to stop future consequences triggered by this reform.
That we are all equal before the law is a fundamental principle that is trampled every day in our country, but give the opportunity, without a brake, for every citizen to seek compensation from those who held, would begin a downward spiral of even more cases that clog the judicial machinery.
be guilty beyond all doubt is difficult to prove in evidence of proof, and for this reason that the trials last for many years, lawyers and procedural errors committed every day in defense of citizens, make the very complex matter, not can propose a reform in an uncertain situation like the one that is hitting our country, where the majority is not solid, where no political surrender their privileges but through laws and financial cuts in all areas, education and culture over all.
We want stability and reform the law to justice in a country world-renowned stability and legality in our country are not there.
Cristian Amadei
0 comments:
Post a Comment